BAIKAL RIFT: ACTIVE OR PASSIVE? - COMPARISON OF THE BAIKAL AND KENYA RIFT ZONES

dc.contributor.author	Logatchev N.A.
dc.contributor.author	Zorin Y.A.
dc.contributor.author	Rogozhina V.A.
dc.date.accessioned	2020-02-14T00:23:36Z
dc.date.available	2020-02-14T00:23:36Z
dc.date.issued	1983
dc.identifier	https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=31055478
dc.identifier.citation	DEVELOPMENTS IN GEOTECTONICS, 1983, 19, C, 223-240
dc.identifier.issn	0419-0254
dc.identifier.uri	https://repository.geologyscience.ru/handle/123456789/15760
dc.description.abstract	The comparison of geological and geophysical data from the Kenya and Baikal rift zones permits us to consider the formation of these zones to be associated with the development of wide asthenospheric upwellings beneath them. In this sense, both rifts are active. Differences between them in amounts of volcanics and geological features may be explained by a higher degree of partial melting of asthenospheric material beneath the Kenya rift.
dc.title	BAIKAL RIFT: ACTIVE OR PASSIVE? - COMPARISON OF THE BAIKAL AND KENYA RIFT ZONES
dc.type	Статья

Files in this item

Files	Size	Format	View
There are no files associated with this item.