P AND S TOMOGRAPHY USING NORMAL-MODE AND SURFACE WAVES DATA WITH A NEIGHBOURHOOD ALGORITHM

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Beghein C.
dc.contributor.author Resovsky J.S.
dc.contributor.author Trampert J.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-05-04T04:34:45Z
dc.date.available 2021-05-04T04:34:45Z
dc.date.issued 2002
dc.identifier https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=1205332
dc.identifier.citation Geophysical Journal International, 2002, 149, 3, 646-658
dc.identifier.issn 0956-540X
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.geologyscience.ru/handle/123456789/28343
dc.description.abstract Traditionally P - and S -wave tomography has been based on the inversion of data that are sensitive to the desired Earth structure, and model covariance is estimated from imperfect resolution and data error propagation. This analysis ignores the usually large -spaces, and hence the significant non-uniqueness of the solution encountered in seismic tomography problems. Here we perform a model space search for P - and S -velocity structure to find acceptable fits to recent normal-mode splitting and fundamental-mode phase velocity data. The survey of the model space employs the neighbourhood algorithm of Sambridge, which preferentially samples the good data-fitting regions. A Bayesian approach is used subsequently to extract robust information from the ensemble of models. We particularly focus on posterior marginal probability density functions and covariances for the various model parameters. The covariance matrix obtained is very useful in providing insights into the trade-offs between the different variables and the uncertainties associated with them. We stay within the framework of perturbation theory, meaning that our emphasis is on the -space of the linear inverse problem rather than the neglected non-linearity. The whole model space (including the -space) is sampled within reasonable parameter bounds, and hence the error bars are determined by all fitting models rather than subjective prior information. We estimated P and S models for spherical harmonic degree two only. The uncertainties are quite large and corresponding relative errors can exceed 100 per cent in the mid-mantle for V p . We find a good correlation of our most likely S model with previous models but some small changes in amplitude. Our most likely P model differs quite strongly from the recent P model SB10L18 and the correlation between our most likely P and S models is small. Among all the good data-fitting models, there are, however, many that have a significant V p -V s correlation. We compute d ln V s /d ln V p from the models that correlate significantly. We find an increase with depth in the top 1500 km. Deeper in the mantle, normal-mode data prefer modest values compared with traveltime data.
dc.subject ERROR BARS
dc.subject NEIGHBOURHOOD ALGORITHM
dc.subject NORMAL MODES
dc.subject SEISMIC LOWER MANTLE TOMOGRAPHY
dc.subject SURFACE WAVES
dc.title P AND S TOMOGRAPHY USING NORMAL-MODE AND SURFACE WAVES DATA WITH A NEIGHBOURHOOD ALGORITHM
dc.type Статья


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • ELibrary
    Метаданные публикаций с сайта https://www.elibrary.ru

Show simple item record