'PUBLISH OR PERISH:' THE PITFALLS OF DUPLICATE PUBLICATION

Noè L.F.; Batten D.J.

dc.contributor.author	Noè L.F.
dc.contributor.author	Batten D.J.
dc.date.accessioned	2025-04-12T04:42:09Z
dc.date.available	2025-04-12T04:42:09Z
dc.date.issued	2006
dc.identifier	https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=14428789
dc.identifier.citation	Palaeontology, 2006, 49, 6, 1365-1367
dc.identifier.issn	0031-0239
dc.identifier.uri	https://repository.geologyscience.ru/handle/123456789/48871
dc.description.abstract	Duplication of previously published text or figures in the scientific literature without adequate citation is plagiarism or, in the case of an author's own work, self-plagiarism. It breaches the ethical standards that are expected in science and threatens the integrity of scientific journals. Three examples of duplication are noted, one of which involves Palaeontology. Redundant publication lowers the quality of scientific literature, damages the good standing of journals, and reduces the intellectual impact of a study. Multiple papers on a particular theme are only acceptable if each builds significantly upon previous work and contains only as much background information as necessary to put the new data and observations into perspective. © 2006 The Palaeontological Association.
dc.subject	PALAEONTOLOGY
dc.subject	PLAGIARISM
dc.subject	PUBLICATION ETHICS
dc.subject	SELF-PLAGIARISM
dc.title	'PUBLISH OR PERISH:' THE PITFALLS OF DUPLICATE PUBLICATION
dc.type	Статья
dc.identifier.doi	10.1111/j.1475-4983.2006.00617.x