TWO TYPES OF CATASTROPHIC GLACIAL ADVANCE

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kazanskiy A.B.
dc.date.accessioned 2020-10-06T05:04:52Z
dc.date.available 2020-10-06T05:04:52Z
dc.date.issued 1989
dc.identifier https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=31075792
dc.identifier.citation Transactions (Doklady) of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Earth Science Sections, 1989, , 3, 193-195
dc.identifier.issn 0891-5571
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.geologyscience.ru/handle/123456789/17694
dc.description.abstract The sudden, rapid advance of the snouts of certain mountain galciers has long been familiar. Systematic study of these phenomena began in 1956, with the catastrophic advance of the snout of the Muldrow Glacier in Alaska. According to A.S. Post a surge wave caused this advance. The next major glacial catastrophe was the advance of the Medvezhye Glacier in the central Pamirs in 1963. Unlike the Muldrow Glacier, the Medvezhye Glacier was intersected by an ice fall. and has periodic occurrence. The author surveys the characteristic indicators of surge and pulsating glaciers. Surge glaciers have relatively smooth surfaces, with smooth transitions from the ablation zones to the accumulation zones. In the quiet period they show no increase in their thickness. Pulsating glaciers exhibit a pronounced continuous buildup of thickness during the quiescent period and often are broken into two parts by an ice fall which separates the part of the glacier subject to catastrophic advances from its upper zone which remains in a relatively quiescent state. of catastropes.
dc.title TWO TYPES OF CATASTROPHIC GLACIAL ADVANCE
dc.type Статья


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • ELibrary
    Метаданные публикаций с сайта https://www.elibrary.ru

Show simple item record