ON THE PRESERVATION OF MANTLE INFORMATION IN ULTRAMAFIC NODULES: GLASS INCLUSIONS WITHIN MINERALS VERSUS INTERSTITIAL GLASSES

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Schiano P.
dc.contributor.author Bourdon B.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-01-15T10:56:58Z
dc.date.available 2021-01-15T10:56:58Z
dc.date.issued 1999
dc.identifier https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=31881331
dc.identifier.citation Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1999, 169, 1, 173-188
dc.identifier.issn 0012-821X
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.geologyscience.ru/handle/123456789/23142
dc.description.abstract This study questions the assumption that silicate melts preserved as glass inclusions in minerals and as interstitial films or pockets in mantle xenoliths have identical chemical compositions to one another and are both suitable for inferring deep mantle melt compositions. Theoretical models of the elastic behavior of melt inclusions indicate that only limited decompression of the inclusion takes place during ascent of the host xenolith, whereas the pressure of an interstitial melt follows the external pressure. Consequences of such behavior are considered using simple model systems, such as the alkali-bearing system forsterite–nepheline–SiO2. With decreasing pressure, phase boundaries shift to silica normative compositions. Consequently, reequilibration of small-degree melts of peridotite, which are characterized by olivine–nepheline normative compositions at moderate pressure, yield quartz normative compositions at a lower pressure. Also, melt inclusions are simpler systems, i.e. the trapped melts are in contact with a single mineral phase, in contrast with interstitial glasses. We show here that experimental heating of the inclusions restores the original melt composition of melt inclusions prior to cooling, which is not possible for interstitial glasses. Data obtained for rehomogenized glass inclusions and interstitial glasses associated in the same xenoliths from intraplate ocean islands and subduction zones confirm the model predictions. In intraplate nodules, the highly silicic, alkali-rich melts preserved as glass inclusions inside minerals are olivine–nepheline normative and represent high-pressure (1 GPa) near-solidus melts in equilibrium with a peridotitic assemblage. In contrast, the silica-normative composition of the interstitial glasses records their last pressure of equilibration, i.e., shallow-level conditions. In subduction zone settings, exsolution of the oversaturated H2O-rich volatile phase and decompression cause conflicting effects on the composition of the melts trapped in xenoliths. The composition of glass inclusions is characterized by higher levels of volatile elements, mainly H2O, and by a higher quartz norm than interstitial glasses. This is consistent with the hypothesis that the glass inclusions represent quenched melts from H2O-saturated peridotite or amphibolite/eclogite systems, whereas the composition of the interstitial glasses indicates reequilibration at low pressure, probably induced by the H2O-rich volatile loss
dc.title ON THE PRESERVATION OF MANTLE INFORMATION IN ULTRAMAFIC NODULES: GLASS INCLUSIONS WITHIN MINERALS VERSUS INTERSTITIAL GLASSES
dc.type Статья


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • ELibrary
    Метаданные публикаций с сайта https://www.elibrary.ru

Show simple item record