A COMPARISON OF THE LOSS OF CO AND CO2 DURING COALIFICATION

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kopp O.C.
dc.contributor.author Bennett M.E.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-03-11T06:59:49Z
dc.date.available 2021-03-11T06:59:49Z
dc.date.issued 2001
dc.identifier https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=765429
dc.identifier.citation International Journal of Coal Geology, 2001, 47, 1, 63-66
dc.identifier.issn 0166-5162
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.geologyscience.ru/handle/123456789/26568
dc.description.abstract We recently published the results of a study of volatiles evolved during coalification (Kopp et al.,.2000) based on the loss of CH4, H2O, and CO. At that time, the loss of CO2 was not modelled because low-rank lignites and subbituminous coals (which we considered to be those ranks most likely to lose CO2) were not included in our model; however, both reviewers of the manuscript asked how the release of CO2 would influence the results of our model. The purpose of this Short communication is to add infor-mation about the loss of CO2 and to compare the results of a model based on CH4, H2O, and CO2 with our previous model based on the loss of CH4, H2O and CO. Both models make use of information2obtained from the US Geological Survey Coal Quality (COALQUIL) database.
dc.title A COMPARISON OF THE LOSS OF CO AND CO2 DURING COALIFICATION
dc.type Статья


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • ELibrary
    Метаданные публикаций с сайта https://www.elibrary.ru

Show simple item record