THE LATE CENOZOIC UPLIFT - CLIMATE CHANGE PARADOX

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Hay W.W.
dc.contributor.author Soeding E.
dc.contributor.author DeConto R.M.
dc.contributor.author Wold C.N.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-05-27T08:20:52Z
dc.date.available 2021-05-27T08:20:52Z
dc.date.issued 2002
dc.identifier https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=14095961
dc.identifier.citation International Journal of Earth Sciences, 2002, 91, 5, 746-774
dc.identifier.issn 1437-3254
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.geologyscience.ru/handle/123456789/28695
dc.description.abstract The geologic evidence for worldwide uplift of mountain ranges in the Neogene is ambiguous. Estimates of paleoelevation vary, according to whether they are based on the characteristics of fossil floras, on the masses and grain sizes of eroded sediments, or on calculations of increased thickness of the lithosphere as a result of faulting. Detrital erosion rates can be increased both by increased relief in the drainage basin and by a change to more seasonal rainfall patterns. The geologic record provides no clear answer to the question whether uplift caused the climatic deterioration of the Neogene or whether the changing climate affected the erosion system in such a way as to create an illusion of uplift. We suggest that the spread of C4 plants in the Late Miocene may have altered both the erosion and climate systems. These changes are responsible for the apparent contradictions between data supporting uplift and those supporting high elevations in the past.
dc.subject Uplift
dc.subject Relief
dc.subject Climate change
dc.subject Erosion
dc.subject Neogene
dc.title THE LATE CENOZOIC UPLIFT - CLIMATE CHANGE PARADOX
dc.type Статья
dc.subject.age Cenozoic::Neogene
dc.subject.age Кайнозой::Неоген ru


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • ELibrary
    Метаданные публикаций с сайта https://www.elibrary.ru

Show simple item record