DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO PERFECTION OF THE GENERAL STRATIGRAPHIC SCALE
- DSpace Home
- →
- Геология России
- →
- ELibrary
- →
- View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
dc.contributor.author | Karaulov V.B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lozovsky V.R. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-10T12:09:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-10T12:09:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | |
dc.identifier | https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=13408639 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation, 2002, 10, 6, 531-546 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0869-5938 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.geologyscience.ru/handle/123456789/28981 | |
dc.description.abstract | Different approaches (American and European) to perfection of the General stratigraphic scale (GSS) are discussed. Practice of the International Stratigraphic Commission that consists, according to recommendations of "International guides," in "hammering in the golden spikes" (GSSP) in rock sequences of monotonous lithology at the levels marked by changes in composition of fossil species (mainly conodonts), which are thought to be evolutionary and independent of the environmental influence, is criticized. Boundaries between series of the Devonian System and between the Permian and Triassic systems are considered as examples, and it is shown that such an approach to recognition of boundaries between major stratigraphic subdivisions violates the priority principle and eventually leads to destabilization and complete reorganization of the GSS. Principles used to specify the GSS are not only of the abstract theoretical interest, but they directly influence practice of geological mapping and other geological investigations. | |
dc.title | DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO PERFECTION OF THE GENERAL STRATIGRAPHIC SCALE | |
dc.type | Статья |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
ELibrary
Метаданные публикаций с сайта https://www.elibrary.ru