THE GUBBIO FAULT: CAN DIFFERENT METHODS GIVE PICTURES OF THE SAME OBJECT?

dc.contributor.author	Collettini C.
dc.contributor.author	Barchi M.R.
dc.contributor.author	Chiaraluce L.
dc.contributor.author	Mirabella F.
dc.contributor.author	Pucci S.
dc.date.accessioned	2021-12-26T02:54:48Z
dc.date.available	2021-12-26T02:54:48Z
dc.date.issued	2003
dc.identifier	https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=1611013
dc.identifier.citation	Journal of Geodynamics, 2003, 36, 1-2, 51-66
dc.identifier.issn	0264-3707
dc.identifier.uri	https://repository.geologyscience.ru/handle/123456789/33846
dc.description.abstract	Different investigation techniques (field geology and structural analysis, geomorphology, seismic reflection profiles and seismological data) have been used to develop images of the Gubbio fault, giving us the opportunity to compare different approaches and evaluate points of consensus and controversy in fault analysis and characterization. From our integrated analysis we define a well-focussed image of the geometry and kinematics of the Gubbio fault and the related Quaternary basin, while the seismogenic role of the fault is still ambiguous.
dc.subject	Quaternary
dc.title	THE GUBBIO FAULT: CAN DIFFERENT METHODS GIVE PICTURES OF THE SAME OBJECT?
dc.type	Статья
dc.subject.age	Cenozoic::Quaternary
dc.subject.age	Кайнозой::Четвертичная	ru

Files in this item

Name: Coll_03.pdf

Size: 1.164Mb

Format: PDF