SIBERIA AND RODINIA

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Pisarevsky S.A.
dc.contributor.author Natapov L.M.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-02-21T00:48:20Z
dc.date.available 2022-02-21T00:48:20Z
dc.date.issued 2003
dc.identifier https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=14536937
dc.identifier.citation Tectonophysics, 2003, 375, 1-4, 221-245
dc.identifier.issn 0040-1951
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.geologyscience.ru/handle/123456789/35607
dc.description.abstract An analysis of the Riphean sedimentary successions along the margins of the Siberian craton, together with recent geochronological and palaeomagnetic data from Siberia, require a revision of the hypothesis that Siberia was part of Rodinia. Some previously proposed Laurentia – Siberia reconstructions may be dismissed, whereas other models are permissible with minor modifications and conservative assumptions about recent geochronological data from Siberia. A comparison of Laurentian and Siberian apparent polar wander paths between 1050 and 1000 Ma shows a striking similarity. However, if Siberia was part of Rodinia, it was probably not contiguous with the Laurentian craton. In this scenario, northern and southern (Stanovoy block) margins of Siberia are possible candidates for conjunction with the rest of Rodinia. We propose a new reconstruction of Laurentia and Siberia at ca. 1050 – 1000 Ma.
dc.subject Siberia
dc.subject Rodinia
dc.subject Proterozoic
dc.subject Plate tectonics
dc.subject Sedimentary successions
dc.subject Palaeomagnetism
dc.subject Passive margin
dc.title SIBERIA AND RODINIA
dc.type Статья
dc.subject.age Precambrian::Proterozoic
dc.subject.age Докембрий::Протерозой ru


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • ELibrary
    Метаданные публикаций с сайта https://www.elibrary.ru

Show simple item record