ACCURATE QUANTIFICATION OF MELT INCLUSION CHEMISTRY BY LA-ICPMS: A COMPARISON WITH EMP AND SIMS AND ADVANTAGES AND POSSIBLE LIMITATIONS OF THESE METHODS

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Pettke T.
dc.contributor.author Halter W.E.
dc.contributor.author Aigner-Torres M.
dc.contributor.author Heinrich C.A.
dc.contributor.author Webster J.D.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-10-20T08:59:37Z
dc.date.available 2022-10-20T08:59:37Z
dc.date.issued 2004
dc.identifier https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=14424403
dc.identifier.citation Lithos, 2004, 78, 4, 333-361
dc.identifier.issn 0024-4937
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.geologyscience.ru/handle/123456789/38981
dc.description.abstract Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICPMS) has recently emerged as a powerful in situ microanalytical technique for major to trace elements in heterogeneous samples such as fluid and melt inclusions. Here, a rigorous comparison of melt inclusion (MI) data acquired by electron microprobe (EMP), ion microprobe (the secondary ion mass spectrometry, SIMS) and LA-ICPMS is used to evaluate the applicability and advantages/drawbacks of these approaches. We are specifically interested in determining if LA-ICPMS data on entire, unexposed, crystallized MI that cannot be homogenized in the lab are accurate and of a useful precision.
dc.subject crystallized melt inclusions
dc.subject analytical accuracy
dc.subject inductively-coupled-plasma mass-spectrometry
dc.subject secondary ion mass spectrometry
dc.title ACCURATE QUANTIFICATION OF MELT INCLUSION CHEMISTRY BY LA-ICPMS: A COMPARISON WITH EMP AND SIMS AND ADVANTAGES AND POSSIBLE LIMITATIONS OF THESE METHODS
dc.type Статья


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • ELibrary
    Метаданные публикаций с сайта https://www.elibrary.ru

Show simple item record