REDUCTIVE BIOTRANSFORMATION OF FE IN SHALE-LIMESTONE SAPROLITE CONTAINING FE(III) OXIDES AND FE(II)/FE(III) PHYLLOSILICATES

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kukkadapu R.K.
dc.contributor.author Zachara J.M.
dc.contributor.author Fredrickson J.K.
dc.contributor.author McKinley J.P.
dc.contributor.author Kennedy D.W.
dc.contributor.author Smith S.C.
dc.contributor.author Dong H.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-04-29T04:07:48Z
dc.date.available 2024-04-29T04:07:48Z
dc.date.issued 2006
dc.identifier https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12091738
dc.identifier.citation Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2006, 70, 14, 3662-3676
dc.identifier.issn 0016-7037
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.geologyscience.ru/handle/123456789/43782
dc.description.abstract A <2.0-mm fraction of a mineralogically complex subsurface sediment containing goethite and Fe(II)/Fe(III) phyllosilicates was incubated with Shewanella putrefaciens (strain CN32) and lactate at circumneutral pH under anoxic conditions to investigate electron acceptor preference and the nature of the resulting biogenic Fe(II) fraction. Anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate (AQDS), an electron shuttle, was included in select treatments to enhance bioreduction and subsequent biomineralization. The sediment was highly aggregated and contained two distinct clast populations: (i) a highly weathered one with "sponge-like" internal porosity, large mineral crystallites, and Fe-containing micas, and (ii) a dense, compact one with fine-textured Fe-containing illite and nano-sized goethite, as revealed by various forms of electron microscopic analyses. Approximately 10-15% of the Fe(III)TOT was bioreduced by CN32 over 60 d in media without AQDS, whereas 24% and 35% of the Fe(III)TOT was bioreduced by CN32 after 40 and 95 d in media with AQDS. Little or no Fe2+, Mn, Si, Al, and Mg were evident in aqueous filtrates after reductive incubation. M?ssbauer measurements on the bioreduced sediments indicated that both goethite and phyllosilicate Fe(III) were partly reduced without bacterial preference. Goethite was more extensively reduced in the presence of AQDS whereas phyllosilicate Fe(III) reduction was not influenced by AQDS. Biogenic Fe(II) resulting from phyllosilicate Fe(III) reduction remained in a layer-silicate environment that displayed enhanced solubility in weak acid. The mineralogic nature of the goethite biotransformation product was not determined. Chemical and cryogenic M?ssbauer measurements, however, indicated that the transformation product was not siderite, green rust, magnetite, Fe(OH)2, or Fe(II) adsorbed on phyllosilicate or bacterial surfaces. Several lines of evidence suggested that biogenic Fe(II) existed as surface associated phase on the residual goethite, and/or as a Fe(II)-Al coprecipitate. Sediment aggregation and mineral physical and/or chemical factors were demonstrated to play a major role on the nature and location of the biotransformation reaction and its products.
dc.subject BIOTRANSFORMATION
dc.subject GOETHITE
dc.subject IRON
dc.subject IRON OXIDE
dc.subject LIMESTONE
dc.subject PHYLLOSILICATE
dc.subject SAPROLITE
dc.subject SEDIMENT CHEMISTRY
dc.subject SHALE
dc.subject BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS)
dc.subject MICAS
dc.subject SHEWANELLA PUTREFACIENS
dc.title REDUCTIVE BIOTRANSFORMATION OF FE IN SHALE-LIMESTONE SAPROLITE CONTAINING FE(III) OXIDES AND FE(II)/FE(III) PHYLLOSILICATES
dc.type Статья
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.gca.2006.05.004


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • ELibrary
    Метаданные публикаций с сайта https://www.elibrary.ru

Show simple item record