Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Langer M.C.
dc.contributor.author Benton M.J.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-02-01T02:53:24Z
dc.date.available 2025-02-01T02:53:24Z
dc.date.issued 2006
dc.identifier https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9330906
dc.identifier.citation Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 2006, 4, 4, 309-358
dc.identifier.issn 1477-2019
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.geologyscience.ru/handle/123456789/47580
dc.description.abstract Early dinosaur evolution has been the subject of several phylogenetic studies and the position of certain basal forms is currently debated. This is the case for the oldest known members of the group, excavated from the Late Triassic Ischigualastian beds of South America, such as Herrerasaurus, Eoraptor, Pisanosaurus, Saturnalia and Staurikosaurus. A new cladistic analysis of the early dinosaur radiation was performed to assess the relationships among the three major clades (Ornithischia, Sauropodomorpha and Theropoda) and to define the phylogenetic position of the basal members of the group. The most parsimonious hypothesis has Silesaurus opolensis as the sister taxon to a dichotomy including monophyletic Saurischia and Ornithischia. The latter includes Pisanosaurus mertii, and the former all other well-known Triassic dinosaurs. Saurischia is composed of two major monophyletic groups: Herrerasauridae (including Herrerasaurus ischigualastensis and Staurikosaurus pricei) and Eusaurischia (including the theropod and sauropodomorph lineages), while Eoraptor lunensis appears to represent the sister taxon to Eusaurischia. Saturnalia tupiniquim is a stem-taxon to Sauropodomorpha and Guaibasaurus candelariensis might belong to the theropod branch. Some of these hypotheses are, however, not strongly supported. Especially uncertain are the affinities of Silesaurus and Guaibasaurus. The latter can only be safely regarded as a saurischian, while the former might belong to the ornithischian lineage. The dinosaurian affinities of Eoraptor and Herrerasauridae are strongly supported. Yet, the possibility that they (especially Eoraptor) represent basal theropods, rather than basal saurischians, cannot be dismissed. In fact, basal saurischian evolution is still too poorly understood for a definitive hypothesis of relationships to be presented.
dc.subject DINOSAURIA
dc.subject SAURISCHIA
dc.subject HERRERASAURIA
dc.subject TRIASSIC
dc.subject PHYLOGENY
dc.subject EARLY RADIATION
dc.title EARLY DINOSAURS: A PHYLOGENETIC STUDY
dc.type Статья
dc.identifier.doi 10.1017/S1477201906001970
dc.subject.age Mesozoic::Triassic
dc.subject.age Мезозой::Триасовая


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • ELibrary
    Метаданные публикаций с сайта https://www.elibrary.ru

Show simple item record