CURRENT PROBLEMS WITH THE NOMENCLATURE OF PHYLLOSILICATES

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Zvyagin B.B.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-02-24T00:19:29Z
dc.date.available 2021-02-24T00:19:29Z
dc.date.issued 2001
dc.identifier https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=13379403
dc.identifier.citation Clays and Clay Minerals, 2001, 49, 6, 492-499
dc.identifier.issn 0009-8604
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.geologyscience.ru/handle/123456789/25442
dc.description.abstract The nomenclature of phyllosilicates is discussed in relation to structural variations of layers and interlayers. Some discrepancies in the nomenclature which arose due to historical reasons and different viewpoints may be reconciled if the choice of the construction units (layers or their parts) is related to definite sets of structures for which these units are common. Features of idealized models approximating real structures should be considered for classification and derivation of nomenclature sets, whereas priority is given to structural variations before lattice and symmetry characteristics. Layer polymorphs, pseudo-polytypes, polytypes (both simple and complex), and OD structures are distinguished. Particular results obtained for micas as a model example of phyllosilicates in relation to modular structures in general are considered in an Appendix.
dc.title CURRENT PROBLEMS WITH THE NOMENCLATURE OF PHYLLOSILICATES
dc.type Статья


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • ELibrary
    Метаданные публикаций с сайта https://www.elibrary.ru

Show simple item record