TRIPUHYITE, FESBO4, REVISITED

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Berlepsch P.
dc.contributor.author Armbruster T.
dc.contributor.author Brugger J.
dc.contributor.author Criddle A.J.
dc.contributor.author Graeser S.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-11-28T04:25:38Z
dc.date.available 2021-11-28T04:25:38Z
dc.date.issued 2003
dc.identifier https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=14257852
dc.identifier.citation Mineralogical Magazine, 2003, 67, 1, 31-46
dc.identifier.issn 0026-461X
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.geologyscience.ru/handle/123456789/32575
dc.description.abstract The exact nature of tripuhyite remains controversial more than 100 years after the first description of the mineral. Different stoichiometries and crystal structures (rutile or tri-rutile types) have been suggested for this Fe-Sb-oxide. To address these uncertainties, we studied tripuhyite from Tripuhy, Minas Gerais, Brazil (type material) and Falotta, Grisons, Switzerland using single-crystal and powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), optical microscopy and electron microprobe analysis. Electron microprobe analyses showed the Fe/Sb ratios to be close to one in tripuhyite from both localities. Single crystal XRD studies revealed that tripuhyite from the type locality and from Falotta have the rutile structure ( P 4 2 mnm, a = 4.625(4) c = 3.059(5) and a = 4.6433(10) c = 3.0815(9) Å, respectively). Despite careful examination, no evidence for a tripled c parameter, characteristic of the tri-rutile structure, was found and hence the structure was refined with the rutile model and complete Fe-Sb disorder over the cationic sites in both cases (type material: R 1 = 3.61%; Falotta material: R 1 = 3.96%). The specular reflectance values of type material tripuhyite and lewisite were measured and the following refractive indices calculated (after Koenigsberger): tripuhyite n min = 2.14, n max = 2.27; lewisite (cubic) n = 2.04. These results, together with those of ⁵⁷ Fe and ¹²¹ Sb Mössbauer spectroscopy on natural and synthetic tripuhyites reported in the literature, indicate that the chemical formula of tripuhyite is Fe ³⁺ Sb ⁵⁺ O 4 (FeSbO 4 ). Thus, tripuhyite can no longer be attributed to the tapiolite group of minerals of general type AB 2 O 6 . A comparison of the results presented with the mineralogical data of squawcreekite suggests that tripuhyite and squawcreekite are identical. In consequence, tripuhyite was redefined as Fe ³⁺ Sb ⁵⁺ O 4 with a rutile-type structure. Both the proposed new formula and unit cell (rutile-type) of tripuhyite as well as the discreditation of squawcreekite have been approved by the Commission on New Mineral and Mineral Names (CNMMN) of the International Mineralogical Association (IMA).
dc.subject Tripuhyite
dc.title TRIPUHYITE, FESBO4, REVISITED
dc.type Статья


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • ELibrary
    Метаданные публикаций с сайта https://www.elibrary.ru

Show simple item record