RUTILE/TIO2II PHASE EQUILIBRIA

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Withers A.C.
dc.contributor.author Essene E.J.
dc.contributor.author Zhang Y.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-30T03:20:46Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-30T03:20:46Z
dc.date.issued 2003
dc.identifier https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=5089817
dc.identifier.citation Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 2003, 145, 2, 199-204
dc.identifier.issn 0010-7999
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.geologyscience.ru/handle/123456789/33947
dc.description.abstract The transition between rutile and α-PbO2 structured TiO2 (TiO2II) has been investigated at 700-1,200 °C and 4.2-9.6 GPa. Hydrothermal phase equilibrium experiments were performed in the multi-anvil apparatus to bracket the phase boundary at 700, 1,000, and 1,200 °C. The equilibrium phase boundary is described by the equation: P (GPa)=1.29+0.0065 T ( °C). In addition, growth of TiO2II was observed in experiments at 500 and 600 °C, although growth of rutile was too slow to bracket unambiguously the equilibrium boundary at these temperatures. Water was not detected in either rutile or TiO2II, and dry synthesis experiments at 1,200 °C were consistent with the phase boundary determined in the fluid-bearing experiments, suggesting that the equilibrium is unaffected by the presence of water. Our bracket of the phase boundary at 700 °C is consistent with the reversed, dry experiments of Akaogi et al. (1992) and the reversals of Olsen et al. (1999). The new data suggest that the phase boundary is linear, in agreement with Akaogi et al. (1992), but in striking contrast to the phase diagram inferred by Olsen et al. (1999). The natural occurrence of TiO2II requires formation pressures considerably higher than the graphite-diamond phase boundary.
dc.subject rutile
dc.title RUTILE/TIO2II PHASE EQUILIBRIA
dc.type Статья


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • ELibrary
    Метаданные публикаций с сайта https://www.elibrary.ru

Show simple item record