FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SYNTHETIC POWDER AND NATURAL OR SYNTHETIC SINGLE-CRYSTAL 1M MICAS: GEOMETRIC HOMO-OCTAHEDRAL VS. GEOMETRIC MESO-OCTAHEDRAL SHEETS

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mercier P.H.J.
dc.contributor.author Rancourt D.G.
dc.contributor.author Robert J.-L.
dc.contributor.author Berman R.G.
dc.contributor.author Redhammer G.J.
dc.date.accessioned 2023-11-26T02:22:39Z
dc.date.available 2023-11-26T02:22:39Z
dc.date.issued 2005
dc.identifier https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=14572587
dc.identifier.citation American Mineralogist, 2005, 90, 2-3, 399-410
dc.identifier.issn 0003-004X
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.geologyscience.ru/handle/123456789/41992
dc.description.abstract Based on powder X-ray diffraction (pXRD) measurements of many mica solid solution series of synthetic powder samples (between Mg, Co, Ni, and Fe end-members, with different degrees of oxidation, vacancy, and Al/Si contents, and including an OH/F substitution series; 75 samples indexed as 1M polytype, space group C2/m) and on 175 previously published structural refinements of 1M micas (refined in space group C2/m) comprising 37 synthetic and 138 natural single-crystal samples, we show that the relation (c/a) cos beta* = 1/3 between the a, c, and beta monoclinic lattice parameters (beta* = 180E - P), holds exactly (within experimental error) for all the synthetic powder samples whereas it does not hold in general for the natural or synthetic single crystal samples. This relation is not imposed by the C2/m space group. It is predicted to hold for geometric homo-octahedral sheets (having equal M1 and M2 site bond-lengths) and predicted not to hold in general for geometric meso-octahedral sheets (having unequal M1 and M2 site bond lengths). We conclude that synthetic powder samples (usually having particle diameters in the range 0.1-20 mum) are geometric homo-octahedral whereas single crystals (typical size of 0.05 x 0.05 x 0.01 mm or larger) are geometric meso-octahedral, with either M1 > M2 (most common, 153 samples out of 175) or M1 < M2. The geometric meso-octahedral character of the single crystals is corroborated by several parameters of the structure refinements. The synthetic powders presumably appear not to have had the time to equilibrate into a minimal free energy state, possibly because average diffusion hoping times occurring in those syntheses (compared to synthesis times) are larger than under synthesis conditions that lead to single-crystals (e.g., fluxing agents used in single-crystal syntheses, geological conditions of natural samples), whereas all the single crystal samples have to some extent exploited the free energy advantage of sorting smaller and larger cations into distinct crystallographic sites in a geometric meso-octahedral sheet structure. These results suggest further experimental work in which the conditions for and kinetics of octahedral M1/M2 chemical ordering could be studied,
dc.title FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SYNTHETIC POWDER AND NATURAL OR SYNTHETIC SINGLE-CRYSTAL 1M MICAS: GEOMETRIC HOMO-OCTAHEDRAL VS. GEOMETRIC MESO-OCTAHEDRAL SHEETS
dc.type Статья
dc.identifier.doi 10.2138/am.2005.1609


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • ELibrary
    Метаданные публикаций с сайта https://www.elibrary.ru

Show simple item record