Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Gibbons S.J.
dc.contributor.author Ringdal F.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-01-18T06:27:38Z
dc.date.available 2025-01-18T06:27:38Z
dc.date.issued 2006
dc.identifier https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=14335187
dc.identifier.citation Geophysical Journal International, 2006, 165, 1, 149-166
dc.identifier.issn 0956-540X
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.geologyscience.ru/handle/123456789/47436
dc.description.abstract It has long been accepted that occurrences of a known signal are most effectively detected by cross-correlating the incoming data stream with a waveform template. Such matched signal detectors have received very little attention in the field of detection seismology because there are relatively few instances inwhich the formof an anticipated seismic signal is known a priori. Repeating events in highly confined geographical regions have been observed to produce very similar waveforms and good signals from events at a given site can be exploited to detect subsequent co-located events at lower magnitudes than would be possible using traditional power detectors. Even greater improvement in signal detectability can be achieved using seismic arrays; running correlation coefficients from single sensors can be stacked over an array or network to result in a network correlation coefficient displaying a significant array gain. If two events are co-located, the time separating the corresponding patterns in the wave train as indicated by the cross-correlation function is identical for all seismic stations and this property means that the correlation coefficient traces are coherent even when the waveforms are not. We illustrate the power of array-based waveform correlation using the 1997 August 16 Kara Sea event. The weak event that occurred 4 hr after the main event was barely detected using an STA/LTA detector on the SPITS array but is readily detected by signal matching on a single channel. The main event was also recorded by the far more distant NORSAR array but no conventional detection can be made for the second event. A clear detection is, however, made when the correlation coefficient traces are beamformed over all sensors of the array.We estimate the reduction in detection threshold of a test signal on a regional seismic array using waveform correlation by scaling down a master signal and immersing it into seismic noise.We show that, for this case, waveform correlation using a single channel detects signals of approximately 0.7 orders of magnitude lower than is possible using an STA/LTA detector on the array beam. Waveform matching on the full array provides an additional improvement of approximately 0.4 magnitude units. We describe a case study in which small seismic events at the Barentsburg coal mine on Spitsbergen were detected using the signals from a major rockburst as master waveforms. Many spurious triggers occurred in this study whereby short sections of signal exhibited coincidental similarity with unrelated incoming wave fronts. We demonstrate how such false alarms can almost always be identified and screened out automatically by performing frequency-wave number analysis upon the set of individual correlation coefficient traces. © 2006 The Authors Journal compilation © 2006 RAS.
dc.subject DETECTION THRESHOLD
dc.subject MATCHED SIGNAL
dc.subject SEISMIC ARRAY
dc.subject WAVEFORM CORRELATION
dc.title THE DETECTION OF LOW MAGNITUDE SEISMIC EVENTS USING ARRAY-BASED WAVEFORM CORRELATION
dc.type Статья
dc.identifier.doi 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02865.x


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • ELibrary
    Метаданные публикаций с сайта https://www.elibrary.ru

Show simple item record