THE LATE CENOZOIC UPLIFT - CLIMATE CHANGE PARADOX

dc.contributor.authorHay W.W.
dc.contributor.authorSoeding E.
dc.contributor.authorDeConto R.M.
dc.contributor.authorWold C.N.
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-27T08:20:52Z
dc.date.available2021-05-27T08:20:52Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.description.abstractThe geologic evidence for worldwide uplift of mountain ranges in the Neogene is ambiguous. Estimates of paleoelevation vary, according to whether they are based on the characteristics of fossil floras, on the masses and grain sizes of eroded sediments, or on calculations of increased thickness of the lithosphere as a result of faulting. Detrital erosion rates can be increased both by increased relief in the drainage basin and by a change to more seasonal rainfall patterns. The geologic record provides no clear answer to the question whether uplift caused the climatic deterioration of the Neogene or whether the changing climate affected the erosion system in such a way as to create an illusion of uplift. We suggest that the spread of C4 plants in the Late Miocene may have altered both the erosion and climate systems. These changes are responsible for the apparent contradictions between data supporting uplift and those supporting high elevations in the past.
dc.identifierhttps://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=14095961
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Earth Sciences, 2002, 91, 5, 746-774
dc.identifier.issn1437-3254
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.geologyscience.ru/handle/123456789/28695
dc.subjectUplift
dc.subjectRelief
dc.subjectClimate change
dc.subjectErosion
dc.subjectNeogene
dc.subject.ageCenozoic::Neogene
dc.subject.ageКайнозой::Неогенru
dc.titleTHE LATE CENOZOIC UPLIFT - CLIMATE CHANGE PARADOX
dc.typeСтатья

Файлы

Оригинальный пакет

Показано 1 - 1 из 1
Загрузка...
Изображение-миниатюра
Имя:
Hay_02.pdf
Размер:
356.23 KB
Формат:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Коллекции