FACIES ARCHITECTURE AND LATE PLIOCENE – PLEISTOCENE EVOLUTION OF A FELSIC VOLCANIC ISLAND, MILOS, GREECE
- DSpace Home
- →
- Геология России
- →
- ELibrary
- →
- View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
FACIES ARCHITECTURE AND LATE PLIOCENE – PLEISTOCENE EVOLUTION OF A FELSIC VOLCANIC ISLAND, MILOS, GREECE
Stewart A.L.; Mcphie J.
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-citation:
Bulletin of Volcanology, 2006, 68, 7, 703-726
Date:
2006
Abstract:
The volcanic island of Milos, Greece, comprises an Upper Pliocene –Pleistocene, thick (up to 700 m), compositionally and texturally diverse succession of calc-alkaline, volcanic, and sedimentary rocks that record a transition from a relatively shallow but dominantly below-wave-base submarine setting to a subaerial one. The volcanic activity began at 2.66±0.07 Ma and has been more or less continuous since then. Subaerial emergence probably occurred at 1.44±0.08 Ma, in response to a combination of volcanic constructional processes and fault-controlled volcano-tectonic uplift. The architecture of the dominantly felsic-intermediate volcanic succession reflects contrasts in eruption style, proximity to source, depositional environment and emplacement processes. The juxtaposition of submarine and subaerial facies indicates that for part of the volcanic history, below-wave base to above-wave base, and shoaling to subaerial depositional environments coexisted in most areas. The volcanic facies architecture comprises interfingering proximal (near vent), medial and distal facies associations related to five main volcano types: (1) submarine felsic cryptodome-pumice cone volcanoes; (2) submarine dacitic and andesitic lava domes; (3) submarine-to-subaerial scoria cones; (4) submarine-to-subaerial dacitic and andesitic lava domes and (5) subaerial lava-pumice cone volcanoes. The volcanic facies are interbedded with a sedimentary facies association comprising sandstone and/or fossiliferous mudstone mainly derived from erosion of pre-existing volcanic deposits. The main facies associations are interpreted to have conformable, disconformable, and interfingering contacts, and there are no mappable angular unconformities or disconformities within the volcanic succession.
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
ELibrary
Метаданные публикаций с сайта https://www.elibrary.ru
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Shilov V.N. (1999)The Early Miocene volcanic rocks of Sakhalin, constituents of the Chekhov Formation, are separated from the older Late Paleogene volcanics (phase I of Cenozoic volcanism) by a thick normal sedimentary sequence and, hence, ...
-
Ispolatov V.O.; Heizler M.; Tikhomirov P.L.; Cherepanova I.Yu. (2004)We used the single-crystal sanidine laser fusion Ar-40/Ar-39 method to date five samples of volcanic rocks from the northern (Chukotka) part of the Cretaceous Okhotsk-Chukotka volcanic belt (northeastern Eurasia). Ages of ...
-
Koloskov A.V.; Flerov G.B.; Perepelov A.B.; Melekestsev I.V.; Puzankov M.Y.; Filosofova T.M. (2011)The evolution of the Quaternary Kekuknai volcanic massif (the western flank of the Sredinnyi Range in Kamchatka) has been subdivided into five stages: (I) the pre-caldera trachybasalt- basaltic andes- ite, (2) the extrusive ...
Search DSpace
Browse
-
All of DSpace
-
This Collection